Legal Opinion

McClintock v. Frohlich

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court. George M.. Ci-iapeine, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. McClintock & Lankford sued Frohlich for $100 for professional services which they alleged they had rendered him under employment by him in the spring of 1900. The defendant answered, denying the employment, and saying that, if plaintiffs rendered any service, it was without being employed, and it.was without his knowledge or consent.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court. George M.. Ci-iapeine, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. McClintock & Lankford sued Frohlich for $100 for professional services which they alleged they had rendered him under employment by him in the spring of 1900. The defendant answered, denying the employment, and saying that, if plaintiffs rendered any service, it was without being employed, and it.was without his knowledge or consent. There was a trial of the case, Lankford testifying that he was employed by Frohlich, .and Frohlich testifying that he did not employ him, and testifying' further that the…

1Opinion of the Court

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) Appellant urges that the court erred in admitting the testimony of witness Wickwine. But appellant does not preserve his objection to the testimony of this witness, either by naming the witness or pointing out the evidence in his motion for a new trial. His objection to the admission of testimony in motion for new trial is of the most general character, and does not present any question for our consideration. This court in Edmonds v. State, 34 Ark. 720, held that “a general assignment in a motion for new trial that the court erred in admitting or excluding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ByrneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Burrow v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Washington County v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API