Legal Opinion
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Nora-Johnson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 23, 2002Published
1Opinion of the Court
797 A.2d 226 (2002)
351 N.J. Super. 177
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, and Nicholas Denucci, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jacqueline NORA-JOHNSON, TTE u/a DTD 6/27/94, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 1, 2002.
Decided May 23, 2002.
David J. Libowsky, Florham Park, argued the cause for appellants (Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys; Mr. Libowsky and Dominic F. Evangelista, on the brief).
John J. Reddy, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Reddy & Reddy, attorneys; Mr. Reddy, on the brief).
Before Judges CONLEY, LEFELT and LISA.[1]
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- In re Luscombe's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Rockwell v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Hersh v. RosensohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Terry Dunker v. George ReichmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.