Legal Opinion

Whimster v. Holmes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1914PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.—Hon. I). E. Bird, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

Plaintiff’s action is for personal injury received in a collision with, defendant’s automobile which was being driven by his chauffeur. The judgment in the trial court was for the plaintiff.

It appears that defendant was. the owner of an automobile car, and that he had a man named Hettenbaugh in charge of it as chauffeur and repairer, and that he kept it in a garage at his residence in Kansas City. Hettenbaugh did not live with defendant, but had a home of his own more than a mile away. On the *132afternoon of the 10th day of July, 1910, defendant, intending to he absent from the city for several…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Garretzen v. DuenckelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Mauch v. City of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Halverson v. BlosserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Maniaci v. Interurban Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Bresnan v. Republic Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API