Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 11, 2017No. 16-3234PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Cirilo Garcia is a native citizen of Honduras currently subject to a reinstated order of removal. Federal regulations say that aliens in his position have no right to apply for asylum. Garcia argues that these regulations are inconsistent with the general asylum statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(1). Following circuit precedent, we initially held that Garcia lacked standing to challenge the regulations because of the discretionary nature of asylum. However, we now grant Garcia’s petition for rehearing to address the standing question. The government now agrees that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Fany Ramirez-Mejia v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  5. Rony Perez-Guzman v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matushkina v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Jesus Cruz Martinez v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. L-M-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  4. Dimpleben Kothari, et al. v. Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  5. Doe v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API