Bingham v. Bingham
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Plaintiff Vicki Bingham appeals from an order made in proceedings supplemental to divorce which changed the custody of their 7 year-old son from her to the defendant Vernal Bingham.
The plaintiff grounds her attack upon the order on the rule to which we agree as a general proposition: that it is presumed to be for the best interest and welfare of a child of tender years to be with his mother. However, under the modern trend of social thinking away from former fixed rigidities, toward equality of the sexes and greater flexibility in considering the qualifications of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Barker v. DunhamUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- Rice v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Mecham v. MechamUtah Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hogge v. HoggeUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Lembach v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Henderson v. HendersonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Boyle v. BoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.