Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Chappell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1967No. 10822PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Plaintiff, assignee of a promissory note, brought suit against the defendant, a comaker. The defendant admitted the execution of the note and its default, but contended that the payee had, by words and conduct, released him from any obligation to pay the note. The jury, in answer to special interrogatories, found in favor of the defendant. However, the court granted plaintiff a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and defendant appeals.

A recital of the facts are unnecessary except to point out that there was no written instrument of release, no consideration, and the note…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Applied Medical Technologies, Inc. v. EamesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kennedy v. Bank of EphraimUtah Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API