Legal Opinion

Senneka v. Bickle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1937No. 30,985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

This appeal by defendant from the judgment for plaintiff brings np for review only the allowance of expert witness fees to certain members of the bar who testified on plaintiff’s behalf at the trial.

Plaintiff, an attorney, sued defendant for $470 for services rendered. As to the amount due, a jury agreed with plaintiff after a rather prolonged trial. Testifying for plaintiff as to the reasonable value of his services were Messrs. Cushing of Hancock, Conklin of Sauk Center, and Zima and Seines of Glenwood, all members of the bar. The two latter were allowed fees of $10 a day.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bekkemo v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API