Legal Opinion
Fry v. Swift
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 16, 1933No. 21405PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEIDD, J.
This suit was originally instituted in the district court of Rogers county by the First National Bank of Claremore, Okla., against the Rogers county drainage district No. 1, to recover upon certain warrants and claims which had been approved by the board of county commissioners of said county. These claims arose out of a drainage project, and were incurred prior to the final report of the viewers The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial below.
The board of county commissioners of Rogers county asked leave to intervene and show the facts. It filed an answer, denying that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Broadwell v. DiricksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Board of Com'rs. of Rogers Co. v. LipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Montgomery v. KrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Cobb v. AlbertiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Seikel v. GrimesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Lindsey v. GambleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951