Clewis v. State

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Darroll William Clewis appeals his conviction on one count of possessing methamphetamine 1 and twenty-one counts of sexually exploiting children. 2 In his sole enumeration of error, Clewis challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Because we hold that the evidence sufficed to sustain the conviction, we affirm.

When reviewing a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. Short v. State. 3 We do…