Legal Opinion
Mayo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 15, 1999No. 1010-98, 1011-98PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
The opinion was delivered
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault and indecency with a child and assessed his punishment at confinement for life and twenty years, respectively. The Court of Appeals reversed the convictions based on the post-trial discovery that one of the jurors did not live in the county where Appellant was tried. Mayo v. State, 971 S.W.2d 464 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, 1998). We granted the Dis trict Attorney’s and the State Prosecuting Attorney’s petitions for discretionary review challenging several aspects of the Court of Appeals’ opinion.
At the hearing…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Gaona v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Shelby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Mendoza v. VaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by52 opinions
- Escamilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Casey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
- Mayo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Fenoglio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.