Legal Opinion
Capital One, N.A. v. Forbes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 12, 2010No. 2D09-4735PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
Capital One, N.A. (the Bank), seeks a writ of certiorari to quash a protective order that allows the disclosure of trade secrets to Mr. Forbes’s consultants and experts. The Bank also asks us to quash the trial court’s order because it did not sufficiently limit the scope of discovery.
Factual Background
The Bank filed a mortgage foreclosure action against Mr. Forbes. Allegedly, Mr. Forbes breached a construction loan agreement. Mr. Forbes filed a counterclaim alleging breach of contract, anticipatory breach of contract, and fraud in the inducement.
Mr. Forbes requested documents…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Parkway Bank v. FORT MYERS ARMATURE WORKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Rodney W. Quinter v. Volkswagen of America, Volkswagen of Atlantic, Inc., Volkswagenwerk, A. G., Byron BlochCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Friedman v. Heart Inst. of Port St. Lucie, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Trustees v. American Educational Enterprises, LLCSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Sea Coast Fire, Inc. v. Triangle Fire, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- McDonald's Restaurants of Florida, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Holt v. KeetleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.