Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Epes
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 29, 1984No. 84-196PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James H. Mckenzie, Special Justice.
This is an illegal exaction suit filed pursuant to Article 16, Section 13 of the Arkansas Constitution and the Declaratory Judgment Act, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-2501 et. seq. (Repl. 1962). Jim Murphy, the plaintiff and appellant, is a citizen and taxpayer of Pope County, Arkansas. In this action, he represents all taxpayers within the state who might be potentially affected by the alleged illegal exactions. By his complaint in Pope County Chancery Court, the plaintiff alleged that the Arkansas Housing Development Agency should be enjoined from issuing Single…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Wells v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Miles v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- John R. Grubb, Inc. v. Iowa Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Turner v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Nabholz Construction Corp. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- City of North Little Rock v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Cortez v. Independence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.