Glass v. Rauwolf
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 140, Oct. T., 1895, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1894, No. 524, on verdict for plaintiff. Replevin to recover a stock of store goods.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 140, Oct. T., 1895, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1894, No. 524, on verdict for plaintiff. Replevin to recover a stock of store goods. Before Ma-gee, J. At the trial it appeared that on November 14, 1893, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement, by which defendant, in consideration of a conveyance of certain real estate to him by plaintiff, was to transfer and assign to plaintiff the stock of goods in his store at Braddock. The real estate was valued at $9,100, and it was stipulated that if the appraisement of the goods did not…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,
One of'the two main questions of fact presented by the testimony, in this action of replevin, was whether, in procurement of the agreement for exchange of defendant’s stock of store goods for certain real estate of the plaintiff, misrepresentation and fraud were practiced by the latter ? The other was whether the goods were actually delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff, pursuant to the agreement? Both of these questions were submitted to the jury on sufficient evidence in a fair and adequate charge of which defendant has no just reason to complain.…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Rauwolf v. GlassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898