Legal Opinion

People v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court erred in providing the jury with an annotated verdict sheet in the absence of defendant’s express consent thereto; by his silence, defendant impliedly consented to the submission of the annotated verdict sheet (see, People v Brown, 90 NY2d 872; cf., People v Richardson, 234 AD2d 952, lv denied 89 NY2d 988).

We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant, raised in his pro se…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HighsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. SerranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Dalcin v. New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API