Legal Opinion

Witherow v. Slayback

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided March 4, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from jury term. Action by James P. Witherow against John D. Slayback and others. From a judgment entered on the direction of the trial judge dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The action is to recover $11,072.63, with interest, from the defendants, as officers of the Port Henry Steel & Iron Company, Limited, upon a note alleged to have been indorsed by that corporation for the accommodation of one Thomas F. Witherbee. The corporation was formed under the business corporation act of 1875 as a limited liability company; and the defendants, together with Thomas F. Witherbee and Andrew were its officers.

The plaintiff alleges five grounds of liability, making each a separate cause of action. These grounds are as follows: (1) Failure to file a report within 20 days after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garrison v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Bonnell v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Losee v. . BullardNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Bruce v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Gold v. . ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. JacobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Osborn v. GilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lee v. JacobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API