Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Tennis

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 19, 2008No. 07-1968PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal by Gary Johnson from the denial of his petition for habeas corpus by the District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania requires us to decide an issue of first impression in this Circuit: Do the teachings of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), apply to a bench trial in a criminal proceeding? Bruton and its progeny established that in a joint criminal trial before a jury, a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation is violated by admitting a confession of a non-testifying…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. CassanoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Vazquez v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Torrie KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. ManfrediDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API