Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1985No. 812-84PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REFUSAL OF APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Under a heading, “SELECTIVE PROSECUTION,” the published opinion of the Austin Court of Appeals somewhat cryptically states:

“Further the evidence from the statement of facts clearly shows that since McWilliams [v. State, 634 S.W.2d 815] supra, with the abandonment of the carving doctrine, multiple charges can be filed in a single criminal episode involving a single victim.”

Hughes v. State, 673 S.W.2d 654, 659 (Tex.App.—Austin 1984), petition refused.

The above quoted statement should be read in light of opinions of this Court in…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Ex Parte SillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Thurmon, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  2. Ex parte CardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. in the Matter of R. G., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  4. in the Matter of R. G., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API