Legal Opinion
Mattel, Inc. v. Interstate Contract Carrier Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 27, 1983No. 30, Docket 83-7243PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
This diversity case involves the question whether the risk of loss in respect to certain goods to be transported falls on Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”), the manufaeturer/distributor, and here shipper, or on Interstate Contract Carrier Corp. (“Interstate”), the contract carrier. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Morris E. Lasker, Judge, held that the risk *18of loss, in this case of toys in a trailer left, on the shipper’s premises, fell on the shipper, and dismissed Mattel’s complaint accordingly. We reverse.
Pursuant to stipulated facts, it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- L. L.F. Ins. Co. v. . R., W. O.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Kessler Export Corp. v. Reliance Insurance Co. of Philadelphia, Penn.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
- London & Lancashire Fire Insurance v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Charles J. Webb & Sons, Inc. v. Central R. Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Avisun Corp. v. Mercer Motor Freight, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conair Corp. v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Societe Generale v. Federal Insurance Co. And Chubb & Son, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Societe Generale v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Industrial Risk Insurance v. United Parcel ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Johnston v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.