Legal Opinion

Tavares v. Aramark Corp.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 4, 2004No. 2002-160-M.PPublished

1Opinion of the Court

841 A.2d 1124 (2004)

Dorene[1] TAVARES

v.

ARAMARK CORPORATION.

No. 2002-160-M.P.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

March 4, 2004.

Kenneth D. Haupt, for Plaintiff.

Susan Pepin Fay, for Defendant.

Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., FLANDERS, GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY and SUTTELL, JJ.

OPINION

WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

In this case we review a decree of the Appellate Division of the Workers' Compensation Court (Appellate Division) affirming Dorene Tavares's (plaintiff) petition to resume collecting weekly indemnity benefits based on incapacity related to her earlier injury. The defendant, Aramark Corporation (defendant),…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Skaling v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. McAree v. Gerber Products CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
  3. Mulcahey v. New England Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  4. Perron v. ITT Wire & Cable Div.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. Lomba v. Providence Gravure, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API