State v. Wesley
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.
Appellant, James Wesley aka Curtis Simmons, was convicted of attempted robbery after he entered a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement. Appellant challenged that conviction and we assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
The pertinent facts are as follows: Appellant was charged with attempted robbery to which he pled not guilty. After the preliminary hearing a plea agreement was reached whereby appellant agreed to plead guilty to attempted robbery in exchange for the state’s withdrawal of an allegation of prior conviction.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Harold HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- State v. McCallisterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Sam A. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JonasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GourdinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- In re Harry B.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.