Legal Opinion

State v. Wesley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1982No. 5236PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant, James Wesley aka Curtis Simmons, was convicted of attempted robbery after he entered a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement. Appellant challenged that conviction and we assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.

The pertinent facts are as follows: Appellant was charged with attempted robbery to which he pled not guilty. After the preliminary hearing a plea agreement was reached whereby appellant agreed to plead guilty to attempted robbery in exchange for the state’s withdrawal of an allegation of prior conviction.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. United States v. Harold HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. State v. McCallisterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Sam A. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. JonasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. GourdinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. State v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. In re Harry B.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API