Legal Opinion

State v. Smith, Ca2007-10-035 (11-17-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2008No. CA2007-10-035PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Larry J. Smith, appeals from the judgment of the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas which, following a jury trial, found him guilty of felonious assault. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm appellant's conviction.

{¶ 2} Appellant was charged with felonious assault and aggravated robbery in connection with an incident involving a beating and robbery or attempted robbery of another man. A jury found appellant guilty of felonious assault and not guilty of the aggravated robbery charge. Appellant presents four assignments of error for our review in this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. GrindstaffOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. NapierOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. GrimmOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API