Legal Opinion
Schoen v. Township of Hillside
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 15, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
155 N.J. Super. 286 (1977)
382 A.2d 704
MARGARET SCHOEN AND EASTERN UNION COUNTY BOARD OF REALTORS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF HILLSIDE AND HILLSIDE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided December 15, 1977.
Mr. William A. Cambria for plaintiffs (Messrs. Sauer, Boyle, Dwyer, Cannellis & Cambria, attorneys; Mr. William A. Cambria on the brief).
Mr. Myron E. Fuhrmann, Township Attorney, for defendants (Mr. Fuhrmann on the brief).
FELLER, J.S.C., Retired, Temporarily Assigned on Recall.
This is an action to set aside as unconstitutional a zoning ordinance,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Berg Agency v. Township of MaplewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Hamilton Amusement Center, Inc. v. PoritzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997