Legal Opinion

Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Soucek

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1927No. 17721PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The parties appear here as they appeared in the trial court, and will, therefore, be referred to as plaintiff and defendants.

Defendant Charles H. Soucek was county treasurer of Grant county and defendant Fidelity & Deposit Company was surety on his official bond. All banks in Grant county, numbering 16 were designated by the board .of county commissioners of said county as depositories for county funds and all filed their bonds as such depositories as provided by law, the Farmers & Merchants Bank of Nash being one of them and filing its bond in the sum of $10,000. Defendant Soucek, as such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Trees v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  2. Hinton v. State Ex Rel. Neal, County AttorneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. State Ex Rel. Adair County Com'rs v. McCloudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. DunlopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Berger v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. In re Protest of Taxpayers of Nichols HillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. State ex rel. Board of Ed. v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API