Legal Opinion

United States v. Crabb

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1912No. 891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 27835 (T. D. 32302).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yries, Judge

This merchandise was imported at Newark, N. J., and invoiced as “cylinder leather, 6 pieces, 6 by 7 inches.” It appears from the record, however, that the width stated on the invoice was incorrect and that the true dimensions were 6 feet 6 inches by two feet.

Duty was taken and classification made of the merchandise as “leather, tanned, n. s. p. f., at 15 per cent under paragraph 451.” *374The Board of General Appraisers, on protest duly made, reversed this decision of the collector and held the leather properly dutiable at the rate of 5 per cent ad valorem under the same paragraph as “band, bend,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koken Barbers' Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. United States v. KundtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. United States v. State Forwarding & Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API