Legal Opinion

Consolidated Copperstate Lines v. United States

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 21, 1969No. 68-575-FPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

Before BROWNING, Circuit Judge, and BYRNE and FERGUSON, District Judges. PER CURIAM:

This is an action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284, 2321-2325 to annul and set aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission. The report and orders of the Commission, dated July 31, 1967, are published at 104 M.C.C. 297, and amended by order of March 4, 1968.

Primarily involved are the purchases of operating rights of two companies, England Transportation Company, a Louisiana corporation, and England Transportation Company of Texas, a Texas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Japanese War Notes Ass'n of the Philippines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Carriers Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. Beaufort Transfer Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
  3. Milne v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Bredehoeft Produce Co. v. Willis Shaw Frozen Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API