Legal Opinion

Kleopfert v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1903No. Nos. 13,510—(177)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $3,016 for personal injuries received while riding a bicycle on a public parkway. From an order, Elliott, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

.START, O. J.

Appeal from an order of the district court of the county of Hennepin sustaining a general demurrer by the defendant to the complaint herein.

The here material allegations of the complaint are substantially these: The defendant is a municipal corporation, and, by the provisions of its charter (Sp. Laws 1889, p. 560, c. 30), a board of park com*159missioners is created, arid made a department of the government of the city, and empowered to acquire, govern, and control public highways and streets, to be known as “parkways,” and otherwise; and; during all of the time herein alleged, a…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ackeret v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Nessen v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API