Legal Opinion

State v. Leftridge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1996No. 8903-31129; CA A87799Published

1Per curiam

Defendant pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. Execution of the sentence was suspended, and he was placed on probation for five years.1 Subsequently, his probation was revoked, and the trial court ordered execution of the previously imposed sentence. The court also ordered the sentence to be served consecutively to a sentence defendant was currently serving in the state of Washington.

Defendant contends that the trial court has no authority, after revoking probation in this case, to modify a sentence previously imposed by ordering…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fergelic v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State v. DebusmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API