Legal Opinion

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted, and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Wayland)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API