Legal Opinion
United States v. Hasan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 23, 2010No. 08-5137PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Hasan Ali Hasan on three counts of perjury. He now appeals that conviction on two bases. First, Mr. Hasan alleges that the government violated his rights under the Court Interpreters Act (“CIA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1827, by failing to provide him with an interpreter when he appeared on two occasions before a grand jury. Second, he contends that there was not sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict him of perjury beyond a reasonable doubt.
This is the second time that Mr. Hasan has appeared before us with these claims. The first time, in United…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- First National Bank v. Woods (In Re Woods)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. MargheimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Underwood v. Bank of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.