Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, New Orleans, & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Saulsbury

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 15 opinions

FROM SCOTT. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Scott County. — G. M. HENDERSON, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice M’Alister

The plaintiff below recovered a verdict and judgment against the railroad company for the sum of $1,895.87 as damages for the destruction of a lot of staves by fire alleged to have been occasioned by the negligent operation of its trains.

Saulsbury & Co., it appears, had been granted a license by the railroad company to erect a stave mill on its right of way, under a written lease or contract which, among other conditions, provided as follows:

“That they [meaning Saulsbury & Co.] will save and hold harmless the trustees of the Cincinnati Southern Railway and the said railway company, from all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Griswold v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Moss v. FortuneTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad v. Unaka Springs Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Smith v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  5. Robinson v. TateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API