Legal Opinion

Eversole v. Spurlino Materials of Indianapolis, LLC

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided April 7, 2011No. Case No. 1:08-cv-1137-TWP-MJDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’, Spurlino Materials, LLC (“Spurlino Materials”) and James Spurlino (“Spurlino”) (collectively, “Defendants”), Motion for Summary Judgment. This dispute stems from an array of allegations made by Plaintiff Ron Eversole (“Eversole”) against his former employer. Eversole’s causes of action include race discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, negligent retention, and defamation.1 For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Zerante v. DeLucaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Willard L. Hemsworth, II v. quotesmith.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Susan McKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Tomanovich, George v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawton v. Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API