Rns Services, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (Msha), and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentAlito, Circuit Judge
As I interpret the decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, it held that RNS was engaged in the “work of preparing the coal” at the site in question because RNS there performed one of the specific activities listed in 30 U.S.C. § 802(i). The majority does not share the Commission’s view that the mere performance of any listed specific activity suffices. Rather, the majority holds that RNS was engaged in the “work of preparing the coal” at the site because it there performed a listed activity on a regular basis. I disagree with both the Commission’s and the majority’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Stroh v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.