Salisbury University v. Joseph M. Zimmer, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
EYLER, JAMES R„ J.
The primary question presented by this case is whether COMAR 21.11.03.14, a regulation issued by the Board of Public Works (“BPW”) is ultra vires because it conflicts with Maryland Code (2009 Repl.Vol.), §§ 15-215 and 15-217 of the State Finance & Procurement Article (“F.P.”). We shall answer the question in the affirmative.
Facts and Proceedings
The conflict in this case arises out of a bid solicitation by Salisbury University, appellant, for a contractor to replace a chiller at the University. Joseph M. Zimmer, Inc., appellee, was one of several contractors to submit a bid.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Gigeous v. Eastern Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- In re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- In Re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Green v. NassifCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baltimore Police Department v. EllsworthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Baltimore Police Dept. v. AntoninCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Balfour Beatty Construction v. Maryland Department of General ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Merryman & FOP v. Univ. of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020