Legal Opinion

Salisbury University v. Joseph M. Zimmer, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 27, 2011No. 462, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EYLER, JAMES R„ J.

The primary question presented by this case is whether COMAR 21.11.03.14, a regulation issued by the Board of Public Works (“BPW”) is ultra vires because it conflicts with Maryland Code (2009 Repl.Vol.), §§ 15-215 and 15-217 of the State Finance & Procurement Article (“F.P.”). We shall answer the question in the affirmative.

Facts and Proceedings

The conflict in this case arises out of a bid solicitation by Salisbury University, appellant, for a contractor to replace a chiller at the University. Joseph M. Zimmer, Inc., appellee, was one of several contractors to submit a bid.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Gigeous v. Eastern Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. In re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. In Re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Green v. NassifCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baltimore Police Department v. EllsworthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Baltimore Police Dept. v. AntoninCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Balfour Beatty Construction v. Maryland Department of General ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Merryman & FOP v. Univ. of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API