Legal Opinion
United States v. Arloha Mae Pinto
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1993No. 92-3435PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant was convicted in 1986 of conspiracy to defraud the United States and filing a false tax return. This court affirmed. United States v. Pinto, 838 F.2d 426 (10th Cir.1988). After serving her three year sentence, Defendant found that her status as a convicted felon disrupted many aspects of her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bromley v. CrispCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert Craig and Peter v. Pappas, United States of America v. Frank P. North, Jr., and Estate of Jack E. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Philip TraversCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. James P. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Wynn Satterlee v. Hugh WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Camfield v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Conrad Lee JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Hodge v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Sealed v. SealedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.