Legal Opinion

Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 14, 1952PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

Plaintiff suffered a fire loss said to have been due to lack of water and pressure at fire hydrants served by the defendant water company. He instituted action by a complaint which defendant attacked upon the ground that it did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. On motion the coiirt rendered judgment for the defendant. This appeal brings up that judgment.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff owned and operated a recreation center in the Township of Ocean, Monmouth County. Near the said premises were two fire hydrants, located…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Nickerson v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  3. Trustees of Jennie DePauw Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church v. New Albany Water WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hone v. Presque Isle Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Doyle v. South Pittsburgh Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Rieder Communities, Inc. v. North Brunswick Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. 1st Nat'l St. Bank, NJ v. Carlyle House, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API