Legal Opinion

Justice v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fultoa superior court. November 8, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtCandler, J.

The Political Code, § 1649, provides that “Ordinaries are authorized to grant licenses to peddle, to indigent and infirm persons, upon such terms as they in their discretion may impose.’ The City of Atlanta, by its charter (Code of Atlanta §§ 64. 65, 70), is authorized to require any person engaged in any trade, business, etc., within the city, to register their names and búsiness and pay a license to carry on such trade or business; and express authority is given to it (§70) to levy and collect from “itinerant traders” such tax as may seem proper. The city has exercised its power by imposing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright & Hill v. Mayor of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Mayor of Savannah v. HinesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Lanier v. Mayor of City MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lyons v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Fairfield v. ShallenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API