Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 24, 1961No. [No. 143, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

The Circuit Court of Baltimore City decreed that the re siduary clause of the last will and testament of George J. Heuter, deceased, should be construed cy pres 1 and his nephews, who were next of kin and only surviving heirs at law, appealed.

The bill to construe the will and for instructions as to the manner in which the residuary estate should be distributed was filed by the Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company as executor under the will, against William H. Miller and Walter Miller, the nephews, and all other parties who had or might have “any interest in the residuary estate.” The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dashiell v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1822
  2. Gray v. Harriet Lane Home for Invalid ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  5. Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Board v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stevens Bros. Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. In Re Estate of ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Gordon v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Ball v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Estate of LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API