White v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of buying and receiving seed cotton; from city court of Lexington — Judge Cloud. March 2, 1911.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
I. The State is not confined to the date alleged in the accusation in proving the crime, but may prove it as of any date within the period of limitations.
2. When the accusation charges the offense generally, the State need not rest its case on proof of a single transaction, but may prove or attempt to prove any number of transactions of the character charged in the accusation and included within its terms.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Grantham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Drummond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.