Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff recovered for an injury received at the intersection of Franklin and Rivard streets, in Detroit. The theory of the plaintiff was that the injury occurred from his stepping on the edge of the iron covering of a manhole, which was situated judt outside the sidewalk, and at the corner formed by the intersection of the two crosswalks with the sidewalk. The evidence tended to show that the covering to the manhole rested upon a stone .which formed a rim, and that either because this stone had worn away, dr because originally too large for the purpose, whenever a person stepped on the edge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keyes v. Village of MarcellusMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Magaha v. Mayor of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  3. Baker v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Jablonski v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Williams v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API