Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Brotherton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1927No. Docket No. 5568PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

— Plaintiff: sued to rescind a contract for the exchange of real properties executed on September 20, 1917. Judgment went for the plaintiff, from which the defendants have appealed on a bill of exceptions.

The complaint is based upon charges of fraudulent misrepresentations on the part of the defendant T. W. Brother-ton, who will hereafter be referred to as the defendant, inasmuch as the property exchanged was his separate property and his co-defendant took no part in the transactions. The complaint alleged that at the time of the exchange the plaintiff was the owner of certain real property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Scott v. Delta Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Thomas v. HackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. St. John v. Consolidated Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neff v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Banchero v. CoffisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Burton v. Santa Barbara Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Ballen v. GasparacUtah Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API