KAREN THOMPSON v. WILLIAM H. ARMSTRONG.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Senior Judge:
A jury awarded William H. Armstrong sizable damages in his suit alleging intentional -interference with a prospective contractual relationship by Karen Thompson. Before us is Ms. Thompson’s appeal contending, mainly, that she was erroneously denied judgment as a matter of law because the suit, premised on true or non-provably false statements she had -made to a government agency about Mr. Armstrong’s fitness for a law enforcement position, was precluded by the First Amendment, In light of what we conclude was Mr. Armstrong’s status as a public official at the time, we…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Banks v. HoffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Khan v. Orbis Business LimitedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020