Legal Opinion

United States v. Jureidini

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 3, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

These three actions, substantially alike, were tried by a jury of one by consent.

In April, 1919, the individual defendants filed their income tax returns. In October, 1920, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed an additional tax against each of them. On November 8, 1920, the Collector of Internal Revenue demanded payment of the taxes. On or about May 13, 1921, each filed a claim for abatement, and each as principal, and the defendant .ZEtna Casualty & Surety Co. as surety, delivered to the collector a bond, which recited that the principal has been assessed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Bowers v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Gray Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  4. United States v. Onken Bros. Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1927
  5. United States v. RennoldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilton Lumber Co. v. GrissomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  2. United States v. Springer & LotzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API