Legal Opinion

Spada v. Sepulveda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated May 17, 2002, which, among other things, denied their application for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The order appealed from did not determine a motion made on notice and therefore is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sena v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Smith v. Plaza Transportation Ambulance ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Barrera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Torres v. Educational Alliance, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hurd v. HurdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. D'Amato v. LefflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API