Legal Opinion

Lally v. Lally's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 21, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

^Affirming.

The correct disposition of this case requires a construction of clause 6 of the will of Minnie H. Lally in connection with sections 2064 and 4843, Kentucky Statutes.

By this clause, the testatrix devised “one-third of the balance or residue” of her real and personal property to James Hanley “absolutely and forever”; one-third to Dennis Hanley “absolutely and forever”; and the remaining one-third to James Hanley in trust “for the sole use of Ellen Ratler,” “duringher natural life”; at her death to Margaret Ratler, to be paid when she arrives at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Carroll's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Struss v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Newton v. Southern Baptist Theological SeminaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Commonwealth v. Wisconsin Chair Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  5. Auxier's v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLeod v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  2. Horseman v. HorsemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API