Legal Opinion
City of Rochester v. Falk
Rochester City Court
Decided January 19, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.
The defendant is charged in an information with having been convicted of a third violation of the speed ordinance of the city of Rochester within a period of eighteen months. He challenges the legality of the procedure.
August 21, 1938, an information was filed in this court charging the defendant with the violation on that date of section 98 of the Public Safety Ordinance of the City of Rochester, commonly known as the “ speed ordinance.” The defendant appeared in court, pleaded not guilty and demanded a jury trial. It was granted. (City of Rochester v. Falk, 7 N. Y. Supp. [2d] 517.) A jury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. . RosenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- People ex rel. Albrecht v. HarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- People ex rel. Levy Dairy Co. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. MosierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
- Blackburn v. MacduffNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. Robbins, New York County Courts1960