Legal Opinion
W. R. Grace & Co. v. Panama R.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 13, 1922No. Nos. 66, 67PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
These two appeals will be disposed of in one opinion, as they arise out of the same voyage, on the same state of facts, and, while there is some additional testimony in the Blyth Case, it added nothing of evidentiary value to that adduced in the. Grace Case.
Both Judges Learned Hand and Augustus N. Hand carefully discussed the facts in their opinions, and we accept the facts as found by them. The sole issue here is whether or not appellant has successfully established a defense under the following clause of the bill of lading:
“No carrier * * * shall be liable * * * for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The FolminaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- The WildcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Ceballos v. The Warren AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Welsh v. AlvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ore Steamship Corporation v. D/SA/S HasselCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Atlantic Banana Company v. MV" CALANCA"District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- W. T. Lockett Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- De Scala v. Panama Canal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Gold Dust Corp. v. Munson S. S. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.