Legal Opinion

Scanlon v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 25, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK C. J.

This ease was reassigned to the writer on April 17, 1935. It is an action by Edward Scanlon against Kansas City to recover damages for the loss of services of his infant son, Cornelius Scanlon, and for care, nursing and medical and surgical treatment occasioned by an injury caused by a fall on a defective sidewalk on August 8, 1900, when the son was two years and five months old. The history of the litigation following the son’s injury is stated in respondent’s brief substantially as follows:

“On December 20, 1900, two suits were filed, one on behalf of the boy for his injuries by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Scanlon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Gibney v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Ephland v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Laycock v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ketcham v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Bachran v. MorishigeHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. MouberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. White v. Maverick Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API