Legal Opinion

Robidoux v. Baltz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1910No. Gen. No. 14,850PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The plaintiffs, Robidoux & Parenteau, recovered a judgment in the Municipal Court of Chicago for $201.60 against the defendants Baltz & Diederichs for cheese sold and delivered. The cheese was shipped by the plaintiffs on July 27, 1907, on the order of defendants, given prior to that date, and was received by the defendants on or about August 6, 1907. Defendants admitted on the trial that they received the cheese and that $201.60 was the correct price for it. The defense attempted to be set up under a plea of set-off was for damages for a breach of contract on the part of plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keeler v. CliffordIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Higbie v. RustIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Burt v. Garden City Sand Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Burt v. Garden City Sand Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ava Blue Grass Creamery Co. v. Sussman Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API