Rodela v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
Appellant was indicted with Larry Fernandez for the offense of burglary of a habitation. The case was tried to a jury. During the deliberations on guilt or innocence, the jury sent out a note indicating they were deadlocked 7-5 (yes-no). The Court then sent in an “Allen” or “dynamite” charge to which appellant objected. See Allen v. United States 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896). The jury found the appellant guilty. Punishment was assessed by the jury at five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections, but probation was recommended. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Arrevalo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Potter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Love v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Byars v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Meza, Saul v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.