Legal Opinion

Barsky v. Katz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1927No. Docket No. 33PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTH; J.

This case is brought to this* court by writ of error. It has been submitted without oral argument. The appellees have failed to file a brief. Plaintiff’s declaration contains two counts: the first for breach of a covenant against incumbrances contained in a deed given by defendants to plaintiff; the second is on the common counts. ■ The defendants filed a plea of the general issue with notice of special defenses, and also filed a cross-declaration, though it appears from appellant’s brief that the cross-declaration probably should have been filed in another case pending between the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simons v. Diamond Match Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hatch v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. S. K. Martin Lumber Co. v. Menominee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gruler v. McRobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peoples Wayne County Bank v. Wolverine Box Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Fisk v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Tomlinson v. Imperial Hotel Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API